Monit Cheung, Ph.D., LCSW, is the Mary R. Professor of Social WorkĮmail: Room: 422 Social Work Building Phone: 71Ĭurrent Curriculum Vitae Personal statement SUSTAIN Wellbeing COMPASS Coordinating Center.Maternal Health Equity Research and Training Center.Child and Family Center for Innovative Research.Ritchie MH (1994) Cultural and gender biases in definitions of mental and emotional health and illness. Osmo R (2001) A conceptual tool: making social workers’ assumptions explicit. Noble C (2016) Green social work – the next frontier for action. McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K (1988) An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. An ex ante assessment of environmental, social and cultural domains. Manitiu DN, Pedrini G (2016) Urban smartness and sustainability in Europe. Mandarino K (2014) Transitional-age youths: barriers to accessing adult mental health services and the changing definition of adolescence. Lyons KH, Manion K, Carlsen M (2006) International perspectives on social work: global conditions and local practice. Leung P, Cheung M (2013) Factor analyzing the “ASK” cultural competency self-assessment scale for child protective services. Kaskie BP, Leung C, Kaplan MS (2016) Deploying an ecological model t stem the rising tide of firearm suicide in older age. Grinnell R (1973) Environmental modification casework’s concern or casework’s neglect? Soc Serv Rev 47:208–220 Gitterman A, Germain CB (2008) The life model of social work practice: advances in theory and practice. Germain CB (1973) An ecological perspective in casework practice. Int Soc Work 57:338–345ĭonarelli Z, Coco GL, Gullo S, Marino A, Volpes A, Salerno L, Allegra A (2016) Infertility-related stress, anxiety and ovarian stimulation: can couples be reassured about the effects of psychological factors on biological responses to assisted reproductive technology? Reprod Biomed Soc Online 3:16–23 J Adolesc 46:107–114ĭominelli L (2014) Promoting environmental justice through green social work practice: a key challenge for practitioners and educators. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21(2):293–308Ĭribb VL, Haase AM (2016) Girls feeling good at school: school gender environment, internalization and awareness of socio-cultural attitudes associations with self-esteem in adolescent girls. Dorsey Press, HomewoodĬousineau TM, Domar AD (2007) Psychological impact of infertility. Ĭompton BR, Galaway B (1975 1984) Social work processes. Love Publishing, DenverĬheung M, Leung CA, Liu ES-C (2017) Advocacy journey promoting child sexual abuse prevention in Hong Kong.
pp 187–249, Greenwich, CT: Jai PressĬheung M, Leung P (2008) Multicultural practice and evaluation: a case approach to evidence-based practice. In: Vasta R (ed) Annals of child development, vol 6. Am Psychol 54:320–323īronfenbrenner U (1989) Ecological systems theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffsīarker R (1973) Explorations in ecological psychology. Keywordsīandura A (1977) Social learning theory. The purpose of this multidimensional assessment is to empower individuals, specifically about replacing their negative thoughts with positive engagement using a holistic view to assess, implement, and evaluate interventions. Additionally, the ASK (Attitude Skill Knowledge) cultural competency instrument is introduced as a tool for self-assessment. Lastly, six elements from the SCE perspective will be summarized to apply clinical skills for the promotion of effective prevention and intervention strategies, culturally relevant assessment of client-in-environment factors, and competency-based evaluation of an effective plan to improve mental health and social care services. Clinical questions will be formulated and illustrated in these case studies.
#MONIT CHEUNG HOW TO#
Two case studies will be presented to illustrate how to apply the SCE framework into practice using tools such as ecomaps and culturagrams. Particularly, this chapter will illustrate how to measure clients’ social-cultural awareness – a concept linking mental health assessment to service planning. It addresses the cycle of problem formulation, solution, and evaluation of practice, which is a basis for understanding how clients’ micro-level problems may directly or indirectly be associated with the macro-level issues in their environment. This chapter describes the complexity of ecological theory for building the social-cultural ecological (SCE) framework for social work practice.
0 kommentar(er)
